(I wrote this piece more than two weeks ago and gave
shipping time to prove me wrong before sending it in for publication. I needn’t
have bothered.)
The saga of the Albedo- sunk off Somalia on July 6 after
more than two and a half years in pirate hands, condition of survivors not
really known- has more or less gone unnoticed except in the usual sections of
the maritime press, and even that seems to be fatigued with seamen hostage
stories.
It appears, also, that the rest of the shipping community
has become weary of striking its usual pose of concern and simulated outrage:
there has been no clamour to pressurise governments to negotiate for the Albedo
survivors release- or, for that matter, those of the Asphalt Venture who remain
hostage since 2010- and after ransom was paid in mid-2011. Even the heart
breaking letter written by the families of the Albedo crew begging Somali’s
worldwide to pressurise their clan leaders to act has failed to generate any real
interest.
Maybe the poseurs in the industry are finally tired of
the act. Or maybe, like Oscar Wilde, they are finding being natural a very
difficult pose to keep up.
Meanwhile, the EUNAVFOR folk seem to be running around
like a bunch of sleazy paparazzi chasing Megan Fox on a beach, sighting an
Albedo lifeboat here or there, but clueless about what actually happened on the
Albedo, exactly how many crew survived and how many are still alive. Or maybe
they know and are not talking. If so, why?
The mainstream media has concentrated more on the ‘last
ship in Somali hands sinks’ story, ignoring the fifty or so seamen still held
hostage by pirates in that failed State. A prominent section of the press in
India reported, instead, that the MV Cotton was hijacked by Somali pirates when
she was actually taken off West Africa! Such is the calibre of news reporting
these days, or maybe it is just a reflection of the lazy interest shown by most
of the general population when it comes to anything maritime.
An interesting thing is happening as West African piracy
escalates in violence and spreads in area, with mother ships now being used and
seamen being taken hostage in large numbers. What is noticeable is that there
seems to be a subtle conspiracy afoot that downplays this menace. Media reports
are nowhere as widespread or as strident as they are with Somali piracy and
shipping organisations are not out there with their patronising advice for
crews or their self-congratulatory press releases. If I were paranoid, I would
think that shipping and its insurers have decided that higher reporting
translates to higher ransoms, and acted as they usually do. To do this they are
posing again- a different pose this time, but a pose nevertheless. They are
pretending, even as everything is hitting the fan, that the problem is not so
big. The other pose of concern for crew has been abandoned.
Unfortunately, this development has also meant that
there nothing being done to address the particular problems of West African
piracy, including issues with corrupt officials in governments linked to either
the hijackers or to the anti-piracy gravy train. The fact that Somalia is a
failed State has some advantages for shipping and navies, who could do as they
wished off the Somali coast. Countries around the West African rim will not
appreciate their waters being treated in a similar cavalier fashion by EUNAVFOR
or some such ‘international’ force. Hell, even carrying arms aboard merchant
ships there can be a big issue.
What all this means, sadly, is that Masters and crews
are more on their own than ever before. One would have wanted the Somali piracy
problem to have ended with a more generic solution, which could be rapidly and
effectively applied everywhere else after adjustments for local conditions. But
that was not meant to be, because shipping and its administrators- whether in
governments, national and international administrations or in commerce- failed.
They failed for many reasons, but the biggest reason they failed is that they
did not care enough about ships’ crews.
Instead of finding long term solutions to the men with
guns that threaten seamen’s lives, they choose, instead, to strike a pose.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment