To the best of my knowledge, there is nothing- not even in the
much hyped Maritime Labour Convention- that requires shipowners of all ocean
going ships to compulsorily provide internet or email facilities to their crews. That, in
2013, four of five seafarers have no access to the internet at sea is
ridiculous. That the picture is even more dismal for ratings- 97 per cent of
whom have no internet access- is also discriminatory.
There are more than a few shipowners and shipmanagers that provide
generous email facilities for officers- and, increasingly, for ratings as well-
aboard their ships. They are the smarter ones, but, as figures show, most
seamen are not granted this apparent luxury.
Ashore, with work-personal life lines getting increasingly
blurred, and with smartphones (often company paid) everywhere, personal
communication during working hours is a commonplace occurrence. Our seamen, who
have little personal life at work anyway, deserve more, not less, of this
facility. At the minimum, they should have a codified and legal right (legal,
since depending on shipmanager goodwill is breaking wind against thunder), to
be able to send and receive emails to anybody they want to on a daily basis.
And they should have a right to do this in some sort of privacy.
Even those spurious arguments that were put forward against
free shipboard email access half a decade ago don’t apply any longer. Installation
of new facilities is relatively inexpensive even if these are needed. But in
most cases even that is unnecessary; tweaking the software and the installation
and networking of a few ‘extra’ computers on each ship is all that is required.
If bandwidth cost is a concern, ban attachments or limit their size, if you
must. And reduce by half the thousands of emails that your office sends the
ship every year, while you are about it.
Other fake arguments against crew email have included the
stupid (crew won’t work), the callous (it is not in their contract), the patronising
(crew’s families don’t normally have email accounts, Captain, one Superintendent told me not all that long
ago) and the plain dumb (We didn’t have email when we sailed, one 55 year old
manager told me once. We wrote letters. Sure you did, I thought. And before you
they used carrier pigeons. And before that, they wrote messages in a bottle and
threw it over the side. And before that, they probably shouted across the
water. So what’s your point? Regression is virtuous?)
It is reprehensible how we expect ship’s crew to sail for
months on end with such little contact with their families. The advent of
mobile phones has eased the situation somewhat: anybody who has sailed recently
will tell you for the rush for prepaid SIM cards at each port of call. When
sailing on fixed runs, all of us had a half dozen or so of these cards, one for
each country that we touched. Stories of ships hugging the coast to get a good
mobile phone signal are well known; I have done this myself.
(Tut-tut, some out of date shipping gaffer will no doubt
tell me from the safety of his shore office. That practice can be a safety
hazard. That is another fake argument, sir, and insulting to boot, because it
questions my competence.)
Today, short port stays and restricted shore leave mean add
to the seaman’s isolation from family and from society. I can tell you, from
experience, that I used to find it very difficult to even find time to call my
family using my own mobile phone in port, work was that crazy. Terminals across
the world, barring few exceptions, usually have few phone or internet
facilities. Internet cafes and long distance calling booths have closed down as
demand has collapsed with mobile phones and internet saturation ashore. All
this makes communication for a seaman much tougher than it used to be. Than it
needs to be.
Which is why cheap and regular communication at sea should be every
seaman’s basic right. Not an industry ‘best practice,’ as shipmanagers will
have you believe, but a right. In any case, shipping’s best practices are best
left uncommented upon.
Somebody amend the Maritime Labour Convention, please. Just
one line: ‘On oceangoing vessels, free email facilities must be provided daily
to each crew; it is a seafarer’s right.’
Maybe the MLC will then do some good after all.
.
.
4 comments:
Great point - and it's another factor seamen can take into consideration regarding employment. I would think that any employer who was responsive to his crews' communications needs might also be more proactive in protecting them from piracy, and taking care of them and their families if they were hijacked. In other words, he might be more likely to behave like a fellow human being!
We used to hear the "they won't work" argument with regard to TV, too. It did not turn out to be true. Good post!
Reid,
Coincidentally, read this today
Online concerns http://www.shiptalk.com/?p=14990
Oops, forgot...
From that shiptalk piece
"Nautilus have questioned the validity of the form and expressed concerns as to how many Liberian flag vessels actually have internet access".
Very germane! One of the things Mariners Action Group discussed with SCI recently was Internet access - SCI was pointing out the access available at the Seamen's Center at Port Newark. But to take advantage of that, a seaman would need to get ashore - a sore point in itself.
The 'digital divide' reflects social and economic disparities that are as stubborn as they are pernicious. But you're right, a line in MLC might help!
Post a Comment