The stifling of maritime skills threatens Indian
shipping in many ways. We easily acknowledge problems like poor calibre of new
entrants or their dwindling numbers. Less easily admitted- although that is
changing fast- is the corruption in the new-entrant job market that has
permeated every pore of the industry and its administration. Admitted extremely rarely, on the other hand,
are longer term problems that are on nobody’s radar screen at the moment. For
one, that the near complete absence of good seafarers today will translate into
a drought of able administrators and technically competent ex-mariners sitting
ashore tomorrow is something that has been ignored so far.
The last few decades have seen many Indians move to-
and thrive in- shipping management jobs ashore, but they have usually done so
on the back of solid experience at sea. True, some of them stayed at sea just
long enough to get what some in India derisively call the ‘chhapa’- a Master’s
or Chief Engineer’s stamp on their CDC. Many of these folk took additional
professional qualifications, many more picked up management jargon and some even
picked up the tools of their new trade ashore. Nothing unusual; happens in many
other industries too. My point is that many thrived in their new environment
because they had potential, were academically competent to begin with, and had gained
professional experience- or enough experience anyway- at sea.
This is not going to happen with the new generation. The
combination of suspect academic credentials, low commitment and an attitude
that sees sailing as ‘a couple of years’ kind of thing will not magically lead
to riches, glory, or a future in industry ashore. In fact, I strongly suspect
that many Indians joining the profession today will struggle to reach a stage
when they will command ships or control engine rooms to begin with, for there
is a steep curve that they have to go up before they will be good enough to do
so.
What this will do to the overall employability of
Indians in shipping is anybody’s guess. Traditionally, shipping has always
sourced many of its technical and operational managers from the growing pool of
experienced Masters and Chief Engineers. If the numbers of these fall
drastically, as I suspect, or if ship owners move to other nationalities, as
many believe, then it is obvious that the future managers of shipping will come
from amongst nationalities that are producing enough Masters and Chief
Engineers to begin with.
Faced with an analogous situation, Europe and the US
have protected their shore maritime jobs somewhat by stifling immigration from
Asia and elsewhere. India does not have the ability to do that; in any case, it
is not a global shipping centre that can attract financial, insurance or other
maritime businesses anyway. Moreover, it is not a major shipowning country, and
none of its nationals are major ship owners internationally- with the possible
exception of SCI, but government owned units work along different paradigms.
And shipmanning - the one area that has seen a lot of foreign interest over the
last thirty years or so- is dying, because Indian seafarers are dying.
Shipmanagement will go, eventually- in a generation or so- to countries producing
seafarers at the time; only natural.
The signs are already there for those who want to see
them. The fall in calibre, competence and experience at sea is a given, but those
who have sailed in the last few years have noticed, on the ground, larger
number of people like superintendents and surveyors landing up on ships with insufficient
experience or knowledge. Operations managers who have little expertise in
operations trying to handle, unsuccessfully, complex ships and their loading
rotations. We see DPA’s who would struggle to manage safety in a lifeboat.
Insurance surveyors with strange ideas about seaworthiness. Inexperienced-
dangerously inexperienced- pilots.
When competence drops, it drops across the board. The dumbing
down of the industry ashore- led by the dumbing down of the industry afloat- is,
essentially, what I am talking about. There are too many Chiefs and not enough
Indians already. The blind will soon be leading the blind in greater numbers
than ever.
There is a paradox of sorts in all this, which muddies
the waters and makes it appear that Indian shipmanagement companies- and the
jobs they create in the country ashore- are on the ascendant. Because so many
shipowners that own just a few ships find it so hard to manage them on their
own in today’s crazy regulatory and commercial environment, we continue to see comparatively
large numbers of vessels going to shipmanagement companies. It may therefore appear,
for some time at least, that because these companies are thriving, the countries
that they source personnel from have it made.
I think this notion is erroneous to the extreme, and I
equate it with a situation where a mom-and-pop store suddenly notices a spurt
in business, and realises that this is thanks to the footfalls generated by the
nearby parking lot of a big supermarket that has opened in the neighbourhood. Mom
and Pop may temporarily rejoice, but unless they are stupid, they know that they
are on their way out. That their very survival is at stake.
.
.
1 comment:
May I add here that the newcomers have a totally different mindset when they join sea. Its very rare now to find a cadet or 3rd Mate, (worse with Engineers because they are awarded a "B-Tech" ) who wants to become a Master or Chief at all. Most of them look at sea as a stepping stone, monetarily, to pursue their MBAs and IAS !
Also, the experience criteria of promotion has increased quite a bit, probably owing to the steadily high percentage of accidents due to human error. Thence, the owners getting stringent. And to wait till then, definitely needs a lot of motivation (self as well as organisational) and patience.
Post a Comment