The decline in Somali piracy has seen a rash of worms crawling out
of the woodwork. Some are busy finger-pointing, some are straining to take the
credit and many others are trying to protect their little fiefdoms. Others are
just adding to the clamour, hoping that their fifteen seconds of time in the
spotlight will last forever.
Nobody seems to have acknowledged the inconvenient truth, amidst
the cacophony, that another ship- the Orna- was released, like the Asphalt
Venture, after payment of ransom from Haradheere in Somalia, but the Captain,
Chief Engineer and four others out of its mostly Indian crew were not. Asphalt
Venture redux.
Meanwhile, the International Maritime Bureau (IMB) tells us what
we already know, that the number of attacks off Somalia have declined sharply.
Others, too, tell us what we already know, that armed guards are by far the
biggest reason why Somali attacks have declined. Finally, they tell us the
obvious.
The US State Department official in charge of counter-piracy policy, Thomas
Kelly, now says of armed guards, "There was a lot of reticence in a lot of
places about using these crews but people learned through experience that this
was a critically important factor in reducing the number of instances. It’s
hard enough to climb up the side of a ship with a Kalashnikov on your back but
it's harder when you have some someone shooting down at you."
"Pirates break off attack and look for softer targets," he
said. "We estimate 80 per cent of ships are using private security. We'd
like it to be 100 per cent."
But that reality (or mini-confession) does not stop others from
claiming a largely unfair share of the credit. The Europeans would have us
believe that EUNAVFOR did it- the ‘it’, being, of course, containing Somali
piracy. The UN still insists, although less convincingly, that the BMPs did it.
The US and other State actors sometimes claim that the attacks on pirate bases
on shore did it, or that Kenyan military actions in Southern Somalia did it,
forget the fact that pirates were not operating from Southern Somalia at all in
recent times. Some say, sporadically, that the trials of pirates -about 1,000
pirates have been imprisoned in 20 nations so far- did it. And
some commentators are still saying, even after the rough weather season is
over, that the monsoons did it.
Other talking heads are saying that this is a lull before the storm
and that pirates are clearing their inventory of hijacked ships (officially
still 11 vessels and at least 188 crew) and waiting for the industry to let its
guard down before they commence attacks anew.
Meanwhile, from the finger-pointing and ‘butler did it’ department, private
maritime security companies (PMSCs) and NATO are busy blaming each
other, the former saying that NATO does not share intelligence with them and
the latter alleging that PMSCs are withholding reports of pirate attacks on ships
that they protect.
Slightly confusing, that allegation, for it means that owners
carrying armed guards are not reporting attacks either. Perhaps they share many
a Master’s sentiment (including mine), that the less one reports, the less
paperwork there is and the fewer number of pen pushers breathe down one’s neck.
Or perhaps shipowners are chary of bad publicity or issues with charterers and
Flag States. Or perhaps Masters feel that there is no point in reporting stuff
to people who are incapable or unwilling to do anything except compile
statistics to be spewed out by after dinner speakers at conference halls ashore.
Also meanwhile, in the adding-to-cacophony department this time,
India asks the IMO - before the Orna release, so these numbers have now changed
for the worse- to ‘intervene’ and have released 43 Indian sailors held hostage
in Somalia. Shipping Minister Vasan is reported to have told IMO Secretary
General Sekimizu this in a meeting last month.
Might as well ask the butler to do that one too.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment