That the
predictions some of us have made, over the years, on China’s exponentially
growing influence in the commercial maritime space have come true is no
consolation to the many beleaguered Indian shipping companies on the verge of
bankruptcy. Or to me, who writes this piece in some despair. The gap between
Chinese and Indian merchant shipbuilding and shipowning businesses was less
apparent in the boom years, when a rising tide lifted all boats and every
shipmanager and shipowner looked smartly visionary, and where every government
could hide its many incompetencies easily. However, Indian maritime weaknesses
have been laid bare - and badly- since, with the mini-collapse of markets
across the world. We are naked, and it is cold.
A ‘Future of
Shipping’ poll conducted recently by a maritime magazine has seen two thirds of
the respondents agreeing that China will overtake countries like Greece and
Japan and become the country with the most merchant ships in the world by 2020.
Now this is
just one poll and its results- essentially opinions and predictions- are hardly
guaranteed to happen in reality. But
that is not the point; whether China becomes the largest shipowning nation or
not in six years is actually immaterial to Indian shipping. The point is that
China is already a global commercial maritime power, and that the gap between
the Chinese and Indian maritime industries is already near insurmountable. And this
gap will widen rapidly with each passing year. It will make Indian shipping
less and less relevant, even if it survives.
The
hand-wringers amongst us- and they are many- will say that China started its
reforms decades before us, that it is not hampered by the clamour of democracy
and that it is already too late- the race is already lost. While they may be
correct on all counts, India must get its act together anyway, and quickly. For
one, giving up the race now will mean ceding to China- a rival, even a future
enemy- and handing it everything on a
platter. For another, our shipping is exposed and open to being overtaken by
other smaller developing economies. And finally, India must get its maritime
act together because otherwise its maritime industry will be decimated by
overwhelming Chinese power. It is clear and logical that Indian shipping will
be utterly destroyed if this trend continues.
As the
Chinese fleet grows, it will continue to employ its own nationals, not Indians.
Its ships will carry Indian cargo. China will spawn its own management companies
and increase the depth of ownership at the expense of Indian shipping. I will
not dwell on the geopolitical implications of expanding Chinese maritime power
too much here except to point out that a rival country already allied with a
neighbouring foe and which has encircled India will naturally be antagonistic
to any Indian interests, including commercial or geopolitical. It is one thing
to be overtaken, quite another to be threatened with annihilation. India will
feel massive pressure wherever it has strategic interests, but particularly in
its own Indian Ocean, Africa and in regions that it presently sources oil and
other resources from.
That aside,
we can actually learn from China, where successive administrations have
managed, overall, a pretty blistering pace of reform in the maritime space. China
has shown that concerted and long term planning shows results when it is backed
by government support and the will to execute. It has pumped in resources to
shipbuilding and shipowning- the two big pillars. It has, despite some pretty
endemic corruption akin to India’s, executed on its plans. India cannot go down
its old path of anaemic policy making, lazy implementation and third-rate
execution much longer. It needs to learn from the Chinese.
Then, China
has pumped hundreds of millions of dollars into its education system (including,
importantly, its vocational education system) and billions into R&D
initiatives across industry. India cannot match this, but it must allocate handsomely
towards manpower development and education. It must promote excellent
vocational schools; tertiary benefits will include a much better calibre of
seagoing personnel.
Support to
shipowners- the much discussed level playing field- is actually a smaller issue
and relatively easily done. Policy must be pragmatic and consistent, and,
equally critically, must be quickly translated into action. Policy makers need
to show some will here, and some spine, for once.
Unfortunately,
I do not see much evidence in India of the
realisation that its maritime space is likely to fall so far behind the Chinese
within the next few years that the industry’s very survival will be at stake.
That realisation is the first step on a long road, where winning and losing is
important, sure, but where accepting that one is not even a player in the game
is harakiri.
.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment