Now
that Devyani Khobragade fracas has reached some sort of conclusion that saves
face on both the US and Indian sides, I am curious to know what will develop in
the case in India that involves AdvanFort and its crew detained in India. It is
possible that I am a hammer seeing only a nail, but I believe that the two
events are closely intertwined and that US actions were in response to the
Seaman Guard Ohio detention of its mercenaries and crew. Countries do not react
to diplomatic petty crimes in a vacuum, and neither do they humiliate female diplomats
of friendly countries with body cavity searches unless they have an agenda or
want to send a message. I believe the agenda was AdvanFort.
Interestingly,
while the Khobragade affair was in full bloom, so to speak, with vitriol
flowing freely from both sides, Advanfort put out a public statement saying
that the crew aboard the armed-guard accommodation vessel had been released on
bail. This turned out to be incorrect; the bail order had been rescinded by a
higher Indian court and the crew were never released. I wonder if this happened
because a US-India deal went sour.
I am
not too concerned with the Khobragade affair; I will only point out that both
the US State and Indian babudom (and other Indian elite) share some distasteful
traits that escalated the mess- they both believe that exceptionalism should
apply to them, that they are above any law- national or international- that
they choose to break and that individuals or countries perceived weaker than
them are fair game. So I leave them to their own predictable devices.
The
Seaman Guard Ohio incident is curious. Here is a ship owned by AdvanFort and
its self- proclaimed billionaire Arab owner Samir Farajallah who is based in
the US; he lives close to the White House. AdvanFort calls itself a private
maritime security company; however, it belongs more in the shadowy world of US
military contractors that operate around the world, and not just in Iraq or
Afghanistan. (A recent report says that US Special Ops forces are present in a
staggering 134 countries around the world, i.e. in 70% of them. This is not a
Bush thing alone; these numbers have gone up by 123% during Obama’s reign. And,
while US Special Ops are not private contractors, the US does use the latter
extensively along with the former. AdvanFort has, amongst other things,
supplied arms to Iraq, Libya and Afghanistan.)
AdvanFort
has been manned in the recent past almost entirely by senior ex US naval
officers, and retired intelligence and military officials ashore. Two of its
senior (non-military) executives quit this month amidst rumours that AdvanFort
was in financial difficulties. Given its background, it is unsurprising that
the company has very close links with the US government and military, even
though it paid a fine in the US two years ago for making false statements in
connection with arms purchases and end-user certificates.
To facts
regarding the Ohio are ominous, and bring up, in India, the ghost of the 1995
Purulia arms drop in West Bengal. The Indians have recovered 35 assault rifles
and 5,724 rounds of ammunition from the Ohio; Indian security and intelligence
agencies are apparently trying to now determine if there is an LTTE, Islamic
terrorist group or naxalite connection here.
AdvanFort’s explanations
about the Ohio, its arms and its location are interesting- and most of them do
not wash. An anti-piracy armed guard ship, which is what they claim the Ohio
is, has no business hanging around the south-eastern tip of India, thousands of
miles away from where the action is. Then, it was claimed that the Ohio was
forced close to the Indian coast because of a cyclone; Indian officials were
quick to point out that the ship wasn’t in cyclone affected waters to begin
with. It does appear that the ship was
low on fuel, though, which is why it came that close to the coast, and which is
why it came about that its 10 crew and 25 security guys- Britons, Indians and
East Europeans- are now in jail.
High profile
British law firm Ince & Company has now been recruited by AdvanFort to
fight the Ohio case. Ince claim that the ship had been boarded many times by
Indian officials, including in Kochi, within the last few months and are
campaigning to move the case to a ‘neutral’ forum. Stories have appeared in the
British media about the squalid conditions of Indian prisons and the need to
honour soldiers who have fought for that country (at least one of the
mercenaries detained off the Ohio is ex British army.) Other stories say that
this is another case of seafarer criminalisation. British PM David Cameron says
he is doing ‘everything possible’ to have the six Britons who were on the Ohio
released from Indian jail.
Caught up in
the high octane Khobragade incident, the Indian media has largely underreported
the Ohio incident. In my opinion, however, the Indian government is doing
things right, for once. They say they are investigating the Ohio- only fair,
given the huge national security implications and given, also, the existing
presence of many foreign intelligence networks in South India. There are no
strident accusations claiming that the Ohio was definitely gun running, though
presumably national intelligence and security agencies are working hard behind
the scenes to rule this possibility out.
India messed
up badly with its handling of the 2012 Italian marine shooting incident; let’s
hope it continues to do things right this time. Let us hope it ignores who lives
close to the White House, or who is in bed with who in Washington, as it
investigates the Seaman Guard Ohio affair- which is far more important to the
nation than the Khobragade body cavity search tamasha.
Meanwhile,
to those who are crying criminalistion of seafarers, I will say this- armed
men, whether they are mercenaries or armed guards, are not seafarers. Even so,
I agree that they should be released as soon as (and if) they are cleared after
investigation in India. As for the squalid Indian prisons bit, well, that is
the way the cookie crumbles, sometimes, in life, when you work far from home.
Ask any real seaman.
.
.
1 comment:
Dear Manu,
I don't know how I missed this one, but somehow I did. Excellent - and I love this quote: "I will only point out that both the US State and Indian babudom (and other Indian elite) share some distasteful traits that escalated the mess- they both believe that exceptionalism should apply to them, that they are above any law- national or international- that they choose to break and that individuals or countries perceived weaker than them are fair game. So I leave them to their own predictable devices." That states the case very well!
God bless you,
Reid
Post a Comment